基于云-TOPSIS-灰关联分析模型的产品服务系统方案评价技术*

doi:10.16731/j.cnki.1671-3133.2024.02.006

现代制造工程 ›› 2024, Vol. 521 ›› Issue (2): 38-44.doi: 10.16731/j.cnki.1671-3133.2024.02.006

基于云-TOPSIS-灰关联分析模型的产品服务系统方案评价技术^*

吕锋¹, 张淑萍¹, 刘芬¹, 冯壮壮¹, 高鸣²

1 河南科技大学机电工程学院,洛阳 471003;
2 第一拖拉机股份有限公司制造工程中心,洛阳 471003

收稿日期:2023-05-04 出版日期:2024-02-18 发布日期:2024-05-29
作者简介:吕锋,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要研究方向为产品服务系统设计。E-mail:lvfeng1980@haust.edu.cn
基金资助:
*国家重点研发计划项目(2020YFB1713500);河南省高等学校重点科研计划项目(20B410002)

Product service system scheme evaluation technology based on cloud-TOPSIS-grey correlation analysis model

LÜ Feng¹, ZHANG Shuping¹, LIU Fen¹, FENG Zhuangzhuang¹, GAO Ming²

1 School of Mechatronics Engineering,Henan University of Science and Technology,Luoyang 471003,China;
2 Centre of Manufacture Technology,First Tractor Company Limited,Luoyang 471003,China

Received:2023-05-04 Online:2024-02-18 Published:2024-05-29

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 方案评价是产品服务系统设计的关键环节之一,评价结果的合理性对企业发展至关重要。基于最小平方和法,构建了云-TOPSIS-灰关联分析模型,对产品服务系统方案进行评价。引入云模型和相对偏好关系量化离散型指标,解决专家评价的模糊性和随机性问题。运用TOPSIS灰关联分析法确定正、负理想灰关联系数矩阵,集成指标权重和正、负理想灰关联系数矩阵建立正、负理想加权灰关联系数矩阵,兼顾了几何方案序列曲线的位置接近度和形状相似度。运用最小平方和法求解灰关联投影系数,确定方案排序。以某农业装备企业拖拉机产品服务系统方案评价为实例,验证了所提模型的科学性和可行性。

关键词: 产品服务系统, 方案评价, 云模型, TOPSIS灰关联分析

Abstract: Scheme evaluation is one of the key links of product service system design.The rationality of evaluation results is very important for the development of enterprises.Based on the least sum of squares method,cloud-TOPSIS-grey correlation analysis model is constructed to evaluate the product service system scheme.Cloud model and relative preference relation were introduced to quantify discrete indexes to solve the problems of fuzziness and randomness in expert evaluation.The positive and negative ideal grey association coefficient matrices were determined by TOPSIS grey association analysis method,and the positive and negative ideal grey association coefficient matrices were established by integrating index weights and positive and negative ideal grey association coefficient matrices,taking into account the position proximity and shape similarity of corresponding geometric scheme sequence curves.The least sum of squares method was used to solve the grey correlation coefficient and determine the scheme ranking.Taking the project evaluation of tractor product service system in an agricultural equipment enterprise as an example,the science and feasibility of the proposed model were verified.

Key words: product service system, program evaluation, cloud model, TOPSIS grey association analysis

中图分类号:

TH111

吕锋, 张淑萍, 刘芬, 冯壮壮, 高鸣. 基于云-TOPSIS-灰关联分析模型的产品服务系统方案评价技术^*[J]. 现代制造工程, 2024, 521(2): 38-44.

LÜ Feng, ZHANG Shuping, LIU Fen, FENG Zhuangzhuang, GAO Ming. Product service system scheme evaluation technology based on cloud-TOPSIS-grey correlation analysis model[J]. Modern Manufacturing Engineering, 2024, 521(2): 38-44.

参考文献

[1] 耿秀丽,王婕.基于复杂网络和偏好顺序结构评估法的产品服务系统设计方案评价[J].计算机集成制造系统,2019,25(9):2324-2333.
[2] 左冠丽,褚学宁,陈东萍,等.基于直觉模糊信息公理的产品服务方案选优[J].计算机集成制造系统,2015,21(4):1134-1141.
[3] 安相华,牛春亮,薛冬娟,等.基于变粒度权重与群决策的产品服务系统方案优选方法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2016,22(1):155-165.
[4] 李玉鹏,吴玥.基于改进随机多目标可接受度分析的产品服务系统方案评价[J].计算机集成制造系统,2018,24(8):2071-2078.
[5] 邱华清,耿秀丽,徐轶才.基于粗糙Choquet积分的产品服务系统设计方案优选[J].中国机械工程,2018,29(20):2416-2424.
[6] 耿秀丽,徐士东,李易林,等.考虑产品服务组合效应的产品服务系统方案评价方法[J].计算机集成制造系统,2015,21(10):2798-2806.
[7] 李孟泽,纪妍,陈刚,等.基于混合不确定信息公理的产品服务系统概念方案评价[J].机械设计与制造,2020(9):292-295,300.
[8] WANG X J,DURUGBO C.Analysing network uncertainty for industrial product-service delivery:a hybrid fuzzy approach[J].Expert Systems with Applications,2013,40(11):4621-4636.
[9] ZHAI L Y,KHOO L P,ZHONG Z W.Design concept evaluation in product development using rough sets and grey relation analysis[J].Expert System with Applications,2009,36(3):7072-7079.
[10] LI M,JIN L,WANG J.A New MCDM Method Combining QFD with TOPSIS for Knowledge Management System Selection from the User′s Perspective in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Environment[J].Applied Soft Computing,2014,21:28-37.
[11] 徐士东,耿秀丽.云模型与TOPSIS相结合的多属性群决策方法[J].计算机应用研究,2017,34(10):2964-2967.
[12] LAN S L,ZHANG H,ZHONG R Y,et al.A customer satisfaction evaluation model for logistics services using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J].Industrial Management & Data Systems,2016,116(5):1024-1042.
[13] 刘恒强,丁华,杨琨.产品服务系统中顾客价值获取与传递方法研究[J].机械设计与制造,2020(10):31-34.

基于云-TOPSIS-灰关联分析模型的产品服务系统方案评价技术^*

Product service system scheme evaluation technology based on cloud-TOPSIS-grey correlation analysis model

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	王春香，郝林文，王耀，纪康辉，刘流. 点云模型孔洞修补研究综述[J]. 现代制造工程, 2020, 480(9): 156-162.
[2]	杨伯军，高雨，温迎强，赵凡，种庆洋. 基于思维流程的创新设计方案评价方法研究[J]. 现代制造工程, 2020, 479(8): 39-46.
[3]	张建, 程光, 李剑昭, 李迪, 陈秋媛, 陈天麟. 某汽车侧围生产线的改善及方案评价[J]. 现代制造工程, 2018, 457(10): 31-36.
[4]	吴占超, 李浩, 密尚华. 基于质量功能屋的产品服务系统模块划分一致性检验评价方法[J]. 现代制造工程, 2017, 439(4): 115-121.