现代制造工程 ›› 2026, Vol. 546 ›› Issue (3): 78-85.doi: 10.16731/j.cnki.1671-3133.2026.03.009

• 车辆工程制造技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于改进行车风险场与动态窗口法的无人车轨迹规划算法研究*

张植钧, 刘攀, 常永强, 王守权, 马迎宸, 安慧   

  1. 河南科技大学车辆与交通工程学院,洛阳 471000
  • 收稿日期:2024-10-29 出版日期:2026-03-18 发布日期:2026-04-03
  • 通讯作者: 刘攀,博士研究生,讲师,硕士研究生导师,主要研究方向为智能网联汽车。E-mail:19337961080@163.com
  • 作者简介:张植钧,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为无人车轨迹规划。常永强,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为自动驾驶汽车的风险评估。
  • 基金资助:
    * 河南省自然科学基金资助项目(242300421446);青海省高原汽车电动化与智能化技术重点实验室开放课题基金项目(QZD03-202403);郑州市重大科技创新专项项目(2021KJZX0060-8)

Research on unmanned vehicle trajectory planning algorithm based on improved driving risk field and dynamic window approach

ZHANG Zhijun, LIU Pan, CHANG Yongqiang, WANG Shouquan, MA Yingchen, AN Hui   

  1. College of Vehicle and Traffic Engineering,Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471000,China
  • Received:2024-10-29 Online:2026-03-18 Published:2026-04-03

摘要: 针对现有轨迹规划算法对车辆行驶风险感知能力不足从而影响避障效果的问题,提出了一种基于改进行车风险场与动态窗口法的无人车轨迹规划算法。首先,考虑车辆的尺寸和行驶方向限制对其行驶风险的影响,在车辆风险场中设计了车辆空间方位影响因子,针对行人的运动特性,构建了行人风险场模型;其次,将车辆风险场模型、行人风险场模型及道路风险场模型进行整合,得到行车统一风险场模型;然后,根据自车极限速度、性能及安全约束,构建速度采样空间,模拟速度采样空间内每组速度对应的未来一段时间内的运动轨迹,构建方位角、速度、障碍物距离及风险场强度等动态窗口法的评价函数,对轨迹进行多方面评估;最后,搭建静态避障场景和动态避障场景,进行仿真验证,结果表明,在静态避障场景和动态避障场景中,所提出算法规划的轨迹曲率峰值分别为0.017 2和0.028 0 m-1,而对比算法规划的轨迹曲率峰值分别为0.023 6和0.035 6 m-1,所提出算法规划的轨迹表现出更好的平滑性,同时有效保障了行车安全。

关键词: 轨迹规划, 行车风险场, 动态窗口法

Abstract: Aiming at the issue of insufficient driving risk perception in existing trajectory planning algorithms, which adversely affects obstacle avoidance performance, it proposes an unmanned vehicle path trajectory planning algorithm based on an improved driving risk field and the Dynamic Window Approach (DWA). Firstly, considering the influence of vehicle dimensions and driving direction constraints on the driving risk of motor vehicles, a spatial orientation impact factor for motor vehicles is incorporated into the vehicle risk field model. Additionally, a pedestrian risk field model is established to account for the motion characteristics of pedestrians. Subsequently, all risk field models are integrated to form a unified risk field model. Finally, based on the ego-vehicle′s maximum speed, performance limitations, and safety constraints, a velocity sampling space is constructed. For each velocity set within this space, the corresponding motion trajectory over a future time period is simulated. An evaluation function for the dynamic window approach incorporating azimuth angle, velocity, obstacle distance, and risk field intensity is developed to assess the trajectories from multiple perspectives. Static and dynamic obstacle avoidance scenarios are then set up for simulation validation. The results demonstrate that in static and dynamic obstacle scenarios, the peak trajectory curvatures planned by the proposed algorithm are 0.017 2 and 0.028 0 m-1, respectively, whereas those planned by the comparative algorithm are 0.023 6 and 0.035 6 m-1. The trajectories generated by the proposed algorithm exhibit superior smoothness while effectively ensuring driving safety.

Key words: trajectory planning, Driving Risk Field (DRF), Dynamic Window Approach (DWA)

中图分类号: 

版权所有 © 《现代制造工程》编辑部 
地址:北京市东城区东四块玉南街28号 邮编:100061 电话:010-67126028 电子信箱:2645173083@qq.com
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发 技术支持:support@magtech.com.cn